采用Schultz对钙质生物污损状况的粗糙度量化和分级，确定了钙质生物污损导致的船舶表面粗糙度函数。基于边界层相似定律，根据相应的船舶表面钙质生物污损粗糙度函数，采用自编的程序，计算和分析了5艘实例船舶在不同钙质生物污损下的阻力增加与船舶长度及速度之间的关系，绘制了相应的实际阻力增加速度曲线。利用实际的阻力增加-速度曲线预测了实例船舶在不同钙质生物污损状况对船舶的摩擦阻力增加和能效增加的影响。结果表明，在重度钙质生物污损下，5艘实例船舶的阻力系数增加为161%～235%，其中的商船，集装箱船和油轮的有效功率增加分别为109%和82% 。
According to Schultz′s rough quantification and classification of the biofouling conditions, the roughness functions of a range of fouling conditions were determined. Based on the boundary layer similarity law analysis, following the roughness functions and u sing an in-house code, the resistance increases of the five example ships for varying ship lengths, ship speeds and fouling conditions were analyzed and calculated. The corresponding actual added resistance-speed relationship curves were obtained. The increasing impact on the ship frictional resistance and performance of the example ships with the different calcareous biofouling conditions were investigated and predicted using the obtained actual added resistance-speed relationship curves. The results showed that the percentage increases in the frictional resistance for the five example ships due to heavy calcareous fouling were in the range of 161%～235% and the increases in the effective power due to the surface conditions for the container ship and the oil tank were predicted to be up to 109%, and 82%, respectively, under heavy calcareous fouling condition.
2022,44(3): 48-52 收稿日期：2021-10-15
DOI：10.3404/j.issn.1672-7649.2022.03.009
分类号：U661.31
作者简介：陈国成(1966-)，男，高级引航员，研究方向为航海技术，船舶和港口污染防治
参考文献：
[1] 刘超, 付玉彬, 郑纪勇. 环境友好型防污剂及海洋防污涂料的研究进展[J]. 材料开发与应用, 2009(4): 69–74
[2] 侯大志, 郦智斌. 船舶表面状态信息采集与评估研究[J]. 中国修船, 2013(6): 37–39
[3] SCHULTZ M P. Effects of coating roughness and biofouling on ship resistance and powering[J]. Biofouling, 2007, 23(5): 331–341
[4] WATANABE S, NAGAMATSU N, YOKOO K, et al. The augmentation in frictional resistance due to slime[J]. Journal of the Kansai Society of Naval Architects, 1969, 131: 45–51
[5] SCHULTZ M P, SWAIN G. The effect of biofilms on turbulent boundary layers[J]. Journal of Flunds Engineering, 1999, 121(1): 44–51
[6] ANDREWARTHA J, PERKINS K, SARGISON J, et al. Drag force and surface roughness measurements on freshwater biofouled surfaces, biofouling[M]. Taylor & Francis, 2010.
[7] SCHULTZ M P, WALKER J M, STEPPE C N, et al. Impact of diatomaceous biofilms on the frictional drag of fouling-release coatings[J]. Biofouling, 2015, 31(9–10): 759–773
[8] MONTY J P, DOGAN E, HANSON R, et al. An assessment of the ship drag penalty arising from light calcareous tubeworm fouling[J]. Biofouling, 2016, 32(4): 451–464
[9] GRANVILLE P S. The frictional resistance and turbulent boundary layer of rough surfaces[J]. Journal of Ship Research, 1958, 2: 52–74
[10] SCHULTZ M P. The relationship between frictional resistance and roughness for surfaces smoothed by sanding[J]. Journal of Engineering, 2002, 124(2): 492–499
[11] SCHULTZ M P, FLACK K. The rough-wall turbulent boundary layer from the hydraulically smooth to the fully rough regime[J]. Journal of fluid Mechanics, 2007, 580: 381–405
[12] SHOCKLING M A, ALLEN J J, SMITS A J. Roughness effects in turbulent pipe flow[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2006, 564: 267–285
[13] HUNDLEY L, TATE C. Hull-fouling studies and ship powering trial results on seven FF 1052 class ships [S]. D W Taylor Naval Ship Research and Development Center, 1980.
[14] HASLBECK E G, BOHLANDER G, 1992. In: Microbial biofilm effects on drag-lab and field[C]//Ship Production Symposium Proceedings. SNAME, 1992
[15] SCHULTZ M P. The effect of biofilms on turbulent boundary layer structure[C]//Florida Institute of Technology, 1998.
[16] SCHOENHERR K E. Resistances of flat surfaces moving through a fluid[J]. Trans. SNAME, 1932, 40: 279–313
[17] TEZDOGAN T, DEMIREL Y K, KELLETT P, et al. Full-scale unsteady RANS CFD simulations of ship behaviour and performance in head seas due to slow steaming[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2015, 97: 186–206
[18] DAY A H, COOPER C. An experimental study of interceptors for drag reduction on high-performance sailing yachts[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2011, 38(8): 983–994
[19] KIM W J, VAN S H, KIM D H. Measurement of flows around modern commercial ship models[J]. Exp. Fluid., 2001, 31(5): 567–578
