针对舰船功效评价体系完备性、合理性不足以及与实战化需求匹配度不高等问题，建立了基于国防部体系结构框架（Department of Defense Architecture Framework, DoDAF）的舰船功效评价体系构建方法。定义舰船实战化需求的概念内涵，围绕舰船功效评价体系构建目的对DoDAF进行了适应性剪裁，建立基于DoDAF的舰船实战化需求建模分析方法；定义舰船功效评价指标体系框架，建立基于DoDAF的舰船功效评价指标提取方法。以航母舰载机调运作业为例验证了方法的可行性。该方法能够改善舰船功效评价体系的完备性和合理性，对于提高舰船设计方案对实战化需求的满足度具有重要意义。
This paper investigated an approach for constructing the warship effectiveness evaluation systems using the Department of Defense Architecture Framework (DoDAF) to solve the problems of a lack of completeness and rationality and a low matching degree between the effectiveness evaluation systems and the actual combat requirements. We defined the concept connotations of the warship actual combat requirements, adaptively tailored DoDAF modeling methodology around constructing the effectiveness evaluation systems, and developed the modeling and analysis method of warship actual combat requirements based on DoDAF. We also defined the framework of the warship effectiveness evaluation systems and proposed the extraction approach for warship effectiveness evaluation indicators based on the DoDAF models. A case study of the transportation operation of carrier-based aircraft verified the feasibility of the proposed method. It can improve the completeness and rationality of the warship effectiveness evaluation systems and is of great significance in enhancing the satisfaction of the warship designs with the actual combat requirements.
2025,47(13): 126-131 收稿日期：2024-10-31
DOI：10.3404/j.issn.1672-7649.2025.13.022
分类号：U674.7
基金项目：国防基础科研计划资助项目（JCKY2016206A001）
作者简介：陈成(1994-),男,博士,工程师,研究方向为舰船装备体系设计、舰船总体技术与系统工程
参考文献：
[1] 张磊, 曹跃云, 李彬, 等. 基于组合赋权法的舰船动力系统使用效能评估研究[J]. 舰船科学技术, 2018, 40(3): 68-71.
ZHANG L, CAO Y Y, LI B, et al. Research on the operational effectiveness evaluation of warship power system[J]. Ship Science and Technology, 2018, 40(3): 68-71.
[2] 张修远, 常欣, 李想, 等. 基于改进ELECTRE法的舰船气流场方案评估方法[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2016, 42(11): 2507-2515.
[3] 李琳琳, 路云飞, 张壮, 等. 基于云模型的指挥控制系统效能评估[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2018, 40(4): 815-822.
[4] 范敏, 高饶翔, 乐天, 等. 基于测试分析和RELS-TSVM的舰船系统固有能力评估[J]. 中国舰船研究, 2019, 14(2): 156-164.
[5] GREEN M JOHN. Establishing system measures of effectiveness[J]. Raytheon Naval and Maritime Integrated Systems, 2001(3): 1-6.
[6] 樊延平, 郭齐胜, 王金良. 面向任务的装备体系作战能力需求满足度分析方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2016, 38(8): 1826-1832.
[7] 李宏伟, 刘建永, 白景波. 工程侦察装备体系效能评估框架研究[J]. 南京理工大学学报, 2017, 41(3): 350-356+370.
[8] 黄冉, 彭祺擘, 武新峰, 等. 基于DoDAF的载人登月体系结构建模[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2023, 45(7): 2131-2137.
[9] 范秋岑, 毕文豪, 张安, 等. 民用飞机高度控制系统MBSE建模方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(1): 164-171.
[10] 朱俊志, 杨珏, 万蕾, 等. MBSE在核电设计中的初步应用研究[J]. 核动力工程, 2022, 43(1): 163-168.
[11] PIASZCZYK C. Model based systems engineering with Department of Defense Architectural Framework[J]. Systems Engineering, 2011, 14(3): 305-326.
[12] DoD Architecture Framework Working Group. The Department of Defense Architecture Framework (DoDAF) Version 2.0 [R]. Washington: The United States Department of Defense, 2009.
[13] 梁振兴, 沈艳丽, 李元平, 等. 体系结构设计方法的发展及应用[M]. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 2012: 166-172.
[14] 罗爱民, 黄力, 罗雪山. 以活动为中心的体系结构设计方法研究[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2008(3): 499-502.
[15] 郝翎钧, 谢君, 吴鹏飞. 基于核心体系结构数据的体系结构设计方法[J]. 电光与控制, 2019, 26(8): 111-115.
[16] KIM C H, WESTON R H, HODGSON A, et al. The complementary use of IDEF and UML modelling approaches[J]. Computers in Industry, 2003, 50(1): 35-56.
